KFC vs Oporto Calories & Macros Australia
KFC's fried chicken range compared against Oporto's flame-grilled menu, matched burger-for-burger and side-for-side using each brand's own published Australian nutrition data.
Lower-calorie winner
KFC
Won 3 of 5 matched pairs
Higher-protein winner
Oporto
Won 3 of 5 matched pairs
Best PEI winner
Evenly matched
KFC 2 – 2 Oporto
Highest-calorie watch-out
6 Pieces of Chicken
1,410 kcal (KFC Australia)
Like-for-like comparison
Flagship chicken burger
Crispy chicken burger
3-piece chicken tenders / strips
Oporto
155g
Regular chips
Bone-in chicken serve
Different cooking style (fried pieces vs flame-grilled half chicken) — closest similarly-sized shareable serve on each menu.
Best picks for fewer calories
- Zinger® Burger — flagship chicken burger
- Original Crispy Burger — crispy chicken burger
- Crispy Chicken Strips (3 Pieces) — 3-piece chicken tenders / strips
- Regular Chips — regular chips
- Half Chicken — bone-in chicken serve
Best picks for more protein
- Zinger® Burger — flagship chicken burger
- Portuguese Crispy Burger — crispy chicken burger
- Crispy Chicken Strips (3 Pieces) — 3-piece chicken tenders / strips
- Chips (Regular) — regular chips
- 6 Pieces of Chicken — bone-in chicken serve
Related guides
Figures come from each brand's own published nutrition data, sourced serving-by-serving and linked back to the original item. Menus, recipes and pack sizes change over time — always check the official source before relying on a number, and treat this as a starting point for comparison, not medical or dietary advice.